Free Speech

PRC (CHINESE COMUNIST PARTY)
PERCEPTION OF FREE SPEECH

"I'm only normalizing a political 'reality' that most people don't recognize."
- reversal, to style delusion as law by violation of terms and accords.

"Free speech doesn't exist where it is inconvenient for the authority who has every incentive to control the public discourse in order to safeguard its point of view and position."

- See also: The National Security Law in Hong Kong (CCP) that bans pro-democracy speech and book sellers.

The CPP assert that, "Classifying diversity as "Pluralism" and "Civil Society", because there is a deep consensus of both parties that the purpose is to influence public policies rather than challenge the legitimacy of the government."

It is therefore amoral according to CCP doctrine: "To challenge the legitimacy of the government," or "To assert that there is mandate to not identify as one people and to avoid contradictions and extremes".

America's Answer:

Goth Culture Summarizes the Rebuttal, that both precepts are incompatibal with a Republican form of Government and repugnant to the Constitution of the United States - which admits the suffrage of the individual is not subject to social or collective or public policy or government findings, and enjoys civil protection whether expressed without interdiction of others free exercise of rights in like manner or the right to maintain separate and valid confidential information.

Extremely dogmatic religious cultures associate this with lucifer/satan, rebellion against the mandate of heaven (China) or Allah (Islam), while this is in fact incorrect and contrary the Laws of the United States - without religious context of any Luciferian moral position.

To athiest / Confusionism / Ruism culture which holds theology is a hyper-rational non-spiritual practical fealty / serfdom culture, the assertion is "mental illness" contrary their core moral code to submit to a sovereign - whether that is a king, emperor, pope or diversified committee of the people or learned men (Sanhedrin).

In the United States mandate, the government is a public servant of the rights of these articles - a legal agency subbordinate to those powers that exist prior their incorporation and mandate, not an agency of the people as a class or as a collective [persona moralis] to bargain by force or influence - and denial of this is high treason on prima facie.

Confusionism (CCP version), known as Ruism, is a religion. Oklahoma Constitution Article I section I-2 bars this from being asserted as a legal claim, and its use as a demand to suggest mental defect or moral defect is criminalized per Title 43A O.S. §43A-5-104; and by Laws of the United States - Title 18 Section 241 and 249 in felony degree.

Bluntengel - Living on the Edge of the Night

Or as Vizipop put it,

A deal is a deal, after all...

This may be a fun way to answer the assertions, but the effort to use violence to silence the rights of others so they cannot speak or solicit, not just speak against those ideas from your own square, is not Masonic Tradition - and appeals to the emotion of the ignorant to harness their fear and ignorance styling the true owners of property as enemies of the people. Disclaiming the contract for labor that creates work, by suggesting that the product of such paid services belong to the builders in franchise beyond the work itself - fraud. There can be NO CONTRACT with such a people. Only war. As they are incapable of cooperation without assuming ownership over all they touch and learn in the process of sharing anything or discovering anything sacred, to its despoilment.

Those too ignorant to recognize what they do is war and genocide, are owed no quarter and forfeit their stand in doing so by estoppel upon the same class [ persona moralis ] they allege to draw a right of standing to assert a claim or force. As the Christian phrase goes, name thyself - and by that true name submit to the authority of the word, enjoined in that true name subordinate to the authority of the King of Kings. It is for this reason, demons and those dealing in false piety treat in false names, for their true name grants power over them and all that they possess, which is forfeit for their perfidy and bad faith on proof before the light - and to abolish false light.

"False light" and other legal terms, and to those familiar with the original texts before translation, leave no doubt the nature of these things; and the error to swear that the speaker is true with certainty - "on the level" - before The Adversary (The Devil, in most cultures) for hope of a grant of authority and power by assertion of a conclusion reserved to the King of Kings; rather than to report the measure of the compass at each question, and only that - the information, rather than the claim of right, which is the actual 'measure' owing report to the Architect of the Universe. The rush to judgement is the Fall. The desire to know 'only a little about everything' rather than be expert and master at something' owning all responsibility, the temptation into true ignorance, apathy, and error.

To surrender the Mastery of the duty of the office to others, is the sale of that office, owing no responsibility to any but the one who holds it - for the price of endorsement and approval, a crime in the eyes of those who stand beyond the Eastern Door of the Temple that leads to the Light. To believe the key and the password should be sold for the approval of such peers, betraying the contract to keep the door shut to all not ready to enter, betray the office.

What lies beyond the door is better than this, and that is greater than society and all its interest, and this is piety that affords investigation; to learn without belief in the right to know or the presumption one's knowledge is ever sufficient to disclaim investigation and information concealed from the world and those not willing to submit themselves to contrary information and ideas out of fear, anger, stupidity, pride, or other excuse to admit the terms are written both in practice and in the purpose of the franchise of others to be entitled to more than in-consideration exchange or owing force to obtain the full measure of the pledge and the promise of a word alone.

Put another way, law is to China what the will of the public will support from time to time, only. While to the West, law is the promise - a contract - owing performance and duty without compromise or other terms not set in express limit, a duty of the agreement between individuals - not states - and government a limited and public servant to those ends, not a master or authority over them owing fealty of any kind.

The contract is a cage, to keep the people from engaging in all the powers of law and authority entitled to them conditional performance of fair and lawful protection from the basic offense - owing full response (22 O.S. §22-31). Break the contract, and you break the cage, and release the people who have, for over 245 years lived in peace (1776-2023) - affording the world some time to adjust to these ideas. If the world cannot adjust, then the only answer is one of NO CONTRACT, and of no quarter. This is the basis of The Enabling of Statehood Act of 1906, and its agreement in 1907, a contract made, subject severability clause in construction of words, operation of law, and the incorporation of specific terms held in the 10th Amendment to be Supreme Law owing incorporation forfeiture of the Federal Union in inseparability clause (Oklahoma Constitution, Article I section I-1, ratified in 1907 by the United States through the Congress of the United States). Remember to read the fine print.