+ Sony invests $1 billion in Epic Games
+ Network Abuse in Ongoing Extortion:
Malicious traffic in rotating pattern from sources linked to the present fraud to extort, damage AT&T and Sparklight Business service, and threats upon TWITCH INTERACTIVE INC. and demands for money from Texas parties concealing the child to impair business in the Okalhoma State Area and recent (Apr 4 2022) release of SSN and other information to extort using assets and hosting of a Texas and Nevada corporation with nexus to CANADA and ICELAND based fraudulent domain use in active extortion demands.
Photo used in impersonation of local HALLIBURTON employee confirmed to be that of DONALD J. BEAL, DALLAS TEXAS, who took and concealed the great-nephew of COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR C. LEE ALLEN, OKLAHOMA NATIONAL GUARD, in 2001-2022 violating ORDERED POSESSION.
Prior suspect employers include ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGIES, and TEK SYSTEMS account manager role documented in such fraud in 2011 Sept 7 admission of intent to extort, citing there also TERRABOX as co-conspirators in this abuse to injure the child. Idenitity of party further confirmed by illegal use of FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT to obtain records for extortion attempts including SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DRIVERS LICENSE number distribution in video upon YOUTUBE, solicitation of persons, and false claims of military service and rank to extort.
Present service appears to originate from COGENT COMMUNICATIONS client server known as atlas.cogentco.com direct LAN connection using 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.14 non-routable internal addresses per traceroute.
Subject is a convicted substance abuser involved in a collission with an SUV from behind, served probation with veterans groups, and incorporated veteran issues into his active concealment of a child to intimidate the public and violate return of the child to the Oklahoma parent, whose person and father and two brothers of his father served in the United States Armed Forces - for business extortion incorporating threats of violence and false name, styled such mental health claims on assumed homosexuality of the Oklahoma parent (false) and later exploited schizophrenia organizations for additional information to incorporate in a fraud for employment and to seek disablement of recovery and all communication with the child.
A formal complaint has been filed with the ADA CITY POLICE. Additional contact April 16 2022 in 36 counts prompted records to pull his photo from 2012 investigation for identical conduct in concert with Alicia Scarbrough and Brian Young on the same fraud and child concealment activity. Abuse began Nov 14 2021 after contact with Alicia Scarbrough at VINTANGE 22 in CITY OF ADA, and has been escalating since. Scarbrough and Young are both business owners concealing their identity to extort SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. as a competitor and legitimate business refusing extortion demands and equity claims already investigated by the OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION in the prior 1990s false claims and false ownership repeated in 2013 extortion claims to obtain MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATES or forfeiture of the Ada Business. Demands today exceed $40,000 violating FEDERAL LAW, to extort payment held in a civil suit outside the court and by witness intimidation to escape discovery and counter-suit of $16 million USD duly filed.
Reletively speaking - The County filed suit under the name of a party voiding their immunity, because the party sued had immunity and was already suing the first party in the same matter in another County. So wrongdoing is by the County, but the party at law is the same party; then exposed to counter-suit per State agreement, limited by the maximum amount of the contract - themed there "unlimited" damages, and so also in Title 23 Section 23-9.1 class D subsection III rule, "unlimited damages", in addition to two counter-suit claims for threat to coerce labor or incarcerate for false debt fully paid and violating a $1.5 billion USD grant subject 31 USC suit filed complaint prior with the U.S. Attorney General for process. Where the US AG fails to act, the relator may sue the STATE OF OKLAHOMA on behalf of the UNITED STATES, and for 25-30% of that amount. This suit may be taken to all other states also, and in direct course is about $11 billion USD in net damages for fraud, showing a failure of the Legislature to perform a duty.
In the counter-suit, versus the party, the STATE shall pay the credit awarded, per the duty to return such claim sole obligation of the present law, not the party - so the STATE would be obligated to issue payment for the prior, and the County responsible for the error (Fraud) would be their delegated party per page one under U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations, a civil contract between the UNITED STATES and STATE OF OKLAHOMA; and also separately between UNITED STATES and STATE OF TEXAS for $720,000,000 USD per year and 2017 to present principle amount.
Since DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CLERK "DAMARCUS OFFORD" improperly transfered the case, preventing trial in 2015-2020 and false suit was field in 2018 by PONTOTOC COUNTY employees as VERONICA PETERSEN then violating that pre-existing UIFSA section 314 immunity to suit prior and ongoing - in a pattern of refusal to comply with legal notice and EXCESSIVE FINE barred Federal Law since 2017, limiting such suit to $500 USD; and where the case was ruled and ORDERED to show the petitioner in default in Dec 2001; after which a new trial inconsistent with rule of trial was carried in fraud and double jeopardy to extort on violation of KELLY v KELLY (2007) rule, to create automatic mistrial in 2002 - no legal thing can occur or support this abuse whatsoever. More than a failure of procedure, the petitioner lied under oath and claimed to live in DALLAS COUNTY, and to have a child born in DALLAS COUNTY. Neither was true, and such fraud for a child that did not legally exist then sustained to conceal a real child taken by force and for concealment in kidnapping and to embezzle from the United States Treasure funds for that fraud over 2001-2022.
Technically, the case has been attempted twice in DALLAS COUNTY, once in DENTON COUNTY, and once in PONTOTOC COUNTY (without jury trial) and to violate Fast and Speedy Trial, as the accuser and respondent never met at any time in a court of law nor were afforded any evidence or witnesses to the respondent - to create a TITLE IV FRAUD so entitled legal defense under Section 6, and failure to serve the correct venue violating section 3, of THE UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT (Rev 2008); the case has been tried 4 times without DUE PROCESS and twice by false practice violating Oklahoma Supreme Court minimum standards to produce mistrial and to incorporate in false Federal Record a report of a criminal conviction at law which does not exist to defraud the Federal Treasury. These are non-negotiable, and void all claims sustained against the Oklahoma Parent, per 15 USC 1673(c) and 1692d rule.
Initially, suing the COUNTY for their action would be the option, but in this matter the County Seat is a delegated arbitrator for a STATE OF OKLAHOMA agency subject strict delegated authority only set in FEDERAL REGISTER a term of the grants, and in that capacity acting there as the delegate of the authority solely held by the UNITED STATES in misuse of the claims and Interstate enforcement by the STATE OF OKLAHOMA. However, where County resources or employee(s) did conceal the report violating relief obligated hearings in 45 CFR basic protections, thereby destroying evidence to bring suit in retaliation, the COUNTY may be liable separately and presently are representing themselves by alleging to be the petitioner in the original suit, who was in default in that suit, prior filing to renew the case under a FALSE MARRIAGE claim in knowing fraud, prohibited by TEXAS STATUTORY CODE TITLE 8 Section 37.03 eligible full application in this UIFSA case a formal defense claim, and such order not registered per no REGISTRATION HEARING, a legally void instrument. Meaning the suit is brought against the party granted jury trial, but has no ORDER to rely on in this claim to show for the suit once trial is underway - and is a nonsuit (suit based on no evidence).
Further, Justice Ginsburg for the 9 Unanimous Supreme Court Justices have prior declared from the Bench to the Material Facts of this matter, it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, per this pronouncement. The Federal Law is very clear on these points, in 74 page instruction to stop, cease illegal actions, and comply in Dec 20 2016 notice representing the Supreme Law of the United States direct authority and delegation of formal powers in concert with the $1.5 billion Grant terms paid to STATE OF OKLAHOMA. Presumed immunity of the City, County, or State to civil suit is also void per 588 U.S. ____ (2019) case no 17-647, and to suggest no right to sue or DUE PROCESS is new offense in each count; a new claim eligible liability. Use of defamation or resort to 43A O.S. 43A-5-104 threats or claims prohibited would be further criminal activity to suppress the public right to be aware of suit and damages possible in such claims as Constitutional right to remedy and restitution, and 5 U.S.C. § 706 statutory rule to original error a duty to provide compensation to accomplish status quo ante bellum (restoration of all loss and standing and security and property prior fraud); and to assert "fraud" expressly. So such resistance to these notice and right to due process and suit is criminal should it speak to compos mentis under such evident and sustained fraud to obstruct justice.
These offenses, in concert, would fall under the new Emmett Till Antilynching Act and conspiracy rule, and lynching any act to deny without due process and prior conviction, to punish - as prior prohibited in 21 O.S. §21-3 and §21-8. It need not require rope or death to be a National Hate Crime, to attempt to suspend that right to suit and punish or allege non compos mentis to evade a duty to protect or undertake jury trial in any case, or to intimidate a witness by serious bodily harm as I suffered in $15,000 injury w surgery.
In short, COMES NOW JAMES ALLEN with Superior Orders for the District Court of Pontotoc County, to the material facts of their duty before the Supreme Law, on 4th and 14th Amendment matters alleged a limit of their power to fine or enforce fines by any State or Federal Civil Court. Honestly, I thought I was bringing doughnuts, but this is what I was given.