ADAOK.ORG
Saturday, March 2nd 2024
Editorial by James Allen

Deceptive Trade Practices

Pursuant Oklahoma State Law Title 78 Section 78-53 (A)(14), (B), and (C):

14. Lists a fictitious business name or assumed business name in a directory assistance database if:

B. Evidence that a person has engaged in a deceptive trade practice shall be prima facie evidence of intent to injure competitors and to destroy or substantially lessen competition.

C. The deceptive trade practices listed in this section are in addition to and do not limit the types of unfair trade practices actionable at common law or under other statutes of this state. Added by Laws 1965, c. 234, § 3. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 139, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1997; Laws 1998, c. 162, § 2, eff. July 1, 1998; Laws 2004, c. 169, § 3, emerg. eff. April 27, 2004.

SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. of Oklahoma has determined based on information provided in DECEMBER 2023 that our competitor alleging to be based in Oklahoma does not have a REGISTERED BUSINESS in the State, nor in the State of Colorado where such calls are routed, on behalf of a company physically located in State of Florida acting in concert with a provider of optical data network services engaged in U.S. Mail threats to family members in City of Ada in January 2024.

This conduct is civil wrongdoing, entitled legal action agaisnt all parties engaged in this deceptive trade practice, and prima facie evidence to destroy or substantially lessen competition of domestic companies in State of Oklahoma through these organized fraud activities.

§78-54. Remedies.

A. Any person damaged or likely to be damaged by a deceptive trade practice of another may maintain an action in any court of equitable jurisdiction to prevent, restrain or enjoin such deceptive trade practice. Proof of actual monetary damages, loss of profits or intent shall not be required. If in such action damages are alleged and proved, the plaintiff, in addition to injunctive relief, shall be entitled to recover from the defendant the actual damages sustained by the person.

B. With respect to the deceptive trade practices described in paragraphs 13 and 14 of subsection A of Section 53 of this title, the Attorney General or a district attorney of this state is authorized to bring actions seeking the following relief:

C. In any action instituted under the provisions of this act, the court may, in its discretion, award reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party. If in any such action the court finds either (1) that the defendant has willfully engaged in a deceptive trade practice or (2) that the plaintiff has acted in bad faith in instituting the action, the court shall award reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party.

D. The relief provided for in this section is in addition to and not in exclusion of remedies otherwise available against the same conduct pursuant to the common law or other statutes of this state.

E. Any duly organized and existing trade association, whether incorporated or not, is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a suit or suits for injunctive relief hereunder as the real party in interest, for or on behalf of one or more of its members, when a deceptive trade practice directly or indirectly affects or threatens to affect or injure such member or members.

Added by Laws 1965, c. 234, § 4. Amended by Laws 1998, c. 162, § 3, eff. July 1, 1998.

SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. of Oklahoma has joined with other companies to form "INTANGIBLE PROPERTY - REGISTERED INTEGRATED SECURE COMMUNICATIONS" - a group of developers seeking damages against those persons responsible for fraudulent lawsuit in NOV 20 2018 in DALLAS COUNTY and related actions on matters then already prior and concurrently in exclusive jurisdiction of DENTON COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF TEXAS, owing default $40 million judgement for IMPROPER PARTY and FICTITIOIUS PETITIONER in public fraud.

Parties are alleged to be registered in DALLAS COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, while operating in fact from CASPER WYOMING, DENVER COLORADO, FORT COLLINS COLORADO, ENID OKLAHOMA, CLEARWATER FLORIDA, VORHEES NEW JERSEY, REYKJAVIK ICELAND, AND BEAUHARNOIS QUEBEC. The parties have no genuine employees or companies in State of Oklahoma or City of Ada at this time.

The parties have engaged in sexually obscene and harassing U.S. Mail threats in JULY and AUGUST 2023 and JANUARY 2024. Such threats include threats to children and persons over 62 years of age with LEGAL DISABILITY owing the protection of the District Attorney of Pontotoc County on criminal complaint.

Per State Law, "Proof of actual monetary damages, loss of profits or intent shall not be required."

Claims to suggest financial loss must be first proven or capital loss a factor to disqualify are therefore sedition in felony degree against this or any firm in Oklahoma. Intent or defense of incompetence are not permissible. Other factors include false claims of conviction and letters threatening to any person or family member.

§21-835. Concealing persons to avoid habeas corpus.

Every person having in his custody or power, or under his restraint, a party who by the provisions of law relating to habeas corpus, would be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus, or for whose relief such writ has been issued, who, with intent to elude the service of such writ, to avoid the effect thereof, transfers the party to the custody, or places him under the power or control of another, or conceals or changes the place of his confinement, or who, without lawful excuse, refuses to produce him, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
R.L.1910, § 2394.

§21-836. Assisting in concealing person to avoid habeas corpus.

Every person who knowingly assists in the violation of the preceding section is guilty of a misdemeanor.
R.L.1910, § 2394.

§21-837. Intimidating laborers.

Every person who, by use of force, threats or intimidation, prevents or endeavors to prevent any hired foreman, journeyman, apprentice, workman, laborer, servant or other person employed by another, from continuing or performing his work, or from accepting any new work or employment, or induces such hired person to relinquish his work or employment, or to return any work he has in hand, before it is finished, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Every person who, by use of force, threats, or intimidation, prevents or endeavors to prevent any farmer or rancher from harvesting, handling, transporting or marketing any agricultural products, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
R.L.1910, § 2396; Laws 1968, c. 213, § 1, emerg. eff. April 23, 1968.

§21-838. Intimidating employers.

Every person who, by use of force, threats or intimidation, prevents or endeavors to prevent another from employing any person, or to compel another to employ any person, or to force or induce another to alter his mode of carrying on business, or to limit or increase the number of his hired foremen, journeymen, apprentices, workmen, laborers, servants or other persons employed by him, or their rate of wages or time of service, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
R.L. 1910, § 2397.

The phrase "or to force or induce another to alter his mode of carrying on business," descirbes the letters submitted OCTOBER 5 2022 and ongoing threats in JANUARY 2024 amid animal mutilations and communication from NTT/SPRINT and COGENT COMMUNICATIONS subcontractor, IX NETWORKS LLC to our company in Oklahoma; owing responsibility to all companies affiliated with that organization and ZAYO GROUP INC. of Colorado, the provider affording such defamation a platform in concealment of a child.

These conditions and inaction of the OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PONTOTOC COUNTY and DISTRICT 22, in concert with assault JANUARY 2024 with injury by suspected State Employees, have compelled IP-RISC to remove its business from the UNITED STATES and to explore options for commercial development in MEXICO as of MARCH 2nd 2022 ongoing suggested seizure of LAND AND PROPERTY to satisfy EXCESSIVE FINES barred by FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NO 244 pg 93492 and sustain malicious prosecution initiated NOV 20 2018 ex juris by forgery of a creditor committed by STATE OF OKLAHOMA per filing contrary Public Law 59-234 CH 3335, 34 Stat., in total breach of State commission of NOV 16 1907.

Per PUBLIC LAW 59-234, CH 3335, 34 Stat.:

    "nothing contained in the said constitution shall be construed to limit or impair the rights of person or property pertaining to the Indians of said Territories (so long as such rights shall remain unextinguished) or to limit or affect the authority of the Government of the United States to make any law or regulation respecting such Indians, their lands, property, or other rights by treaties, agreement, law, or otherwise, which it would have been competent to make if this act had never been passed."

The abduction of children from Indian Territory so ends this contract, with total breach and forfeiture owing and due by United States upon its signature of terms November 16 1907. A title for the property "Federal Union" is sought in specific collateral, owing surrender. Performance for value is sole condition, affording no financial or monetary substitution on concealment of the child "Baby Boy Allen" abducted from a contract fully paid of custody in AUGUST 2001 and filing in OCT 2001 of a fraudulent child to defraud the court prior 2002 bill ex-post-facto to conceal false swearing and misjoin a new party and new chose of action to alter the purpose of the suit on simple amendment, a violation of limitations on civil process and not a qualified NUNC PRO TUNC AMENDMENT in application - fraud against the People and suit in creditor named NOV 20 2018 in DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA there named "Veronica Peterson v James Allen", of which "Veronica Peterson" is not a person or member of the class and forgery by STATE OF OKLAHOMA to bring false suit against a natural person, member of the class subject PUBLIC LAW 59-234 and creditor of the United States owing performance or forfeiture for total breach.

The instrument of debt tendered was between "Veronica Marie Petersen" as primary obligor and "JAMES ALLEN" as secondary obligor, owing UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE section 3-302 unconscionable contract on prior securitized collateral in a CARROLLTON TX birth, on OCT 1 2001 pleading alleging for benefit claim a DALLAS TX birth and fraud in both chose of action not supported by memorandum, eye witnesses, and record - perjury alleged to defraud United States backed by State of Texas and State of Oklahoma for concealment of a child from RIGHT OF POSSESSION spanning 2001 AUGUST to 2024 to overcome the PUBLIC LAW 59-234 CH 3335, 34 Stat. debt of United States by fraud, force, and threat of murder with forced labor a component to coerce abandonment of the creditor by abuse of a child and abuse of legal parents to cause the death of Dr. Klepper March 2 2022 and use of their legal name to defraud in 2002, 2022, and ongoing public threats to interfere in Interstate Commerce and interstate trade and International Trade (15 USCA 1).

§21-843.4. Exploitation of elderly or disabled adult.

A. As used in this section, “exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult” means:

B.

C. For purposes of this section, “elderly person” means any person sixty-two (62) years of age or older. Added by Laws 2006, c. 215, § 1, eff. July 1, 2006.

Threats to disable or impair the use of property in City of Ada, Pontotoc County, or other Oklahoma areas subject to the OCT 5 2022 written threat by IX NETWORKS LLC demanding payment for protection and prior attacks resulting in the maiming of four animals and the death of one animal by violence and six by biological agent deposited in tainted meat placed on the property - following the death of a witness DECEMBER 25 2022 by fire - warrant that any communication in this manner or cause be limited to SERVICE OF PROCESS and IN WRITTEN FORMAT, on a pattern of violence and employment of GOOGLE LLC and ALPHABET INC. properties to damage the custody and conceal a child from RIGHT OF POSSESSION or other superior rights owing duty of money paid in full for consideration and CONTRACT NOT TO SUE also made in 2016 in DENTON COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF TEXAS on violation of TEXAS FAMILY CODE 157.375 rule by attorneys of the Texas Bar Association in continuing coercive threats to abduct a child and conceal a child in perpetuity for commercial export of military technology and trade secrets from private property of members of the People of Oklahoma entitled to those discoveries and designs, invention, and specific trademarks and names then in commercial use and prior documented (1992-2024), a registered mark in signature appropriated for use in forgery and IDENTITY THEFT to interefere in Interstate trade and International trade of the United States.

The terms "deception or intimidation" and "with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult" as a custodian of a grandchild of that elderly person - a FEDERAL TRUST and duty of the primary obligor per UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE to perform and afford access to the child as specified, or be in violation of this law, for consideration demanded and obtained despite no intent to perform the return or communication or location service of the child and to remove the child to the State of Florida and to other States and locations than where the child was alleged concealed.

These threats began AUGUST 11th 2001, and continue in JANUARY 2024 without relief, owing performance of duty by the OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY or OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, not performed on petition and repeated demand for relief consistently over 22 years.

Total Breach of Public Law 59-234 CH 3335, 34 Stat., is therefore alleged, a full proof.

This is not a treaty or a Constitutional dispute owing "interpretation" - it is a collateral contract matter of NOV 16 1907, a senior instrument of debt owing performance in full for value or default and forfeiture for non-performance, a legal instrument and non-debtor named in civil suit entitled their relief or lesser damages - denied formally to prove total breach by wilfull act of the county and ongoing interference to seize substantial assets to direct the spending of such funds on property OTHER THAN THAT OF THE ELDERLY PERSON as to cause maximum spoliation and deprive the parties of ORDINARY COMMERICAL UTILITY AND RIGHTS TO THOSE LOCATIONS in a pattern of Interstate racketeering and corrupt organizations activity not granted authority to the State of Oklahoma expressly (Fed Reg Vol 81 No 244 pg 93492, a reserved power exclusive and delegated and limited to those prescibed by the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY). No Chevron Right exists in such language, written published registered UNITED STATES PUBLIC POLICY. A contract that is contrary public policy is void in the making or enforcement, and unenforceable contract barred by the Statute of Frauds in RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS and RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF RESTITUTION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT. Because specific collatera is attached to this contract, a security of the United States duly made, the automatic execution upon default is not required further consideration by a judicial ORDER to become effective, as law of contract.

State of Oklahoma has accepted over $1 billion USD per year in UNITED STATES payment for these terms, effective mandatory as law (REQUIRED STATE LAW) February 21 2017, making this matter one of embezzlement of Federal Funds from the UNITED STATES TREASURY for non-compliance also. Thus there is a paid-in contract owing performance, affording no lesser terms, prior NOV 20 2018 filing of the malicious prosecution by an improper party and 2018-2024 ongoing obstruction of recovery of a missing and exploited person to coerce surrender of assets from a legally disabled person over 62 years of age by a primary obligor of a UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRUST, and their appointed legal attorney in 2003 letter declaring such LAW OF AGENCY and intent to defraud.

Any person alleged to be liable in a PUBLIC CIVIL CLAIM may cite CRIMINAL CODE to illustrate the ILLEGALITY of a demand, which by MEMORANDUM in CIVIL PROCDEDURE renders such demand void at law and further asserts all rights of necessity to expect and demand performance by Criminal Law or be free of further obligations arising from violation of any statute or rule, upon cause of "illegality" per RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS and RESTATEMENT OF RESTITUTION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT. No civil contract may suggest a right to act contrary law against a third party to coerce a direct party, as specified in 15 USCA 1692d rule. Threat of arrest of a party if they appear at the place of contest, is further violation of 15 USCA 1692g rule, owing void to that civil action over the party threatened with loss of freedom or harm to obstruct justice in a Federal Trust matter (18 USCA 1509).

See Also:

RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS (1981)
§ 189, 190, 192, 193, 194 (A Promise Interfereing With Contract of Another), 206 (Interpretation Against the Draftsman), 207 (Interpretation Favoring the Public), 2008 (Unconscionable Contract or Term), 218 (Untrue Recitals; Evidence of Consideration), 230 (Event that Terminates Duty, see contract simple), 250 (When a Statement or an Act Is a Repudiation), 251 (When a Failure to Give Assurance May be Treated as a Repudiation), 272 (Relief Including Restitution), 285 (Contract Not to Sue).

And

RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF RESTITUTION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT (2011)
§ 32 (Illegality) and § 39 (Profit from Opportunistic Breach).

The prior breach of contract is alleged a $30 billion breach, in excess of earnings ordinary to the Federal Register Vol 81 No 244 terms and United States Public Policy, to overcome competitors by partnership between Federal Union members States and NATION OF JAPAN to export technology in trade secret from United States to People's Republic of China in 2018-2022 and public declaration of new discovery obtained from 1998-2003 documents of SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. upon taking for abuse of a newborn child to extort surrender of property made written demand in 2003 and 2013 and 2021-2023 extensive letters for NVIDIA CORPORATION and SOFTBANK GROUP CORP of NATION OF JAPAN as a major shareholder, valued at over $40 billion USD in 2018 and $1.1 Trillion USD in 2024; owing return and restitution for malicious prosecution in forgery of a Federal Trust in 2018 NOV 20 to 2024 by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA to aid in concealment of a child from ORDERED POSSESSION and prior fully paid SOLE CUSTODY CONTRACT, a contract paid in full as of AUGUST 11 2001 prior later OCT 1 2001 and 2002 filings to claim res nullius to defraud custody of a child and by fraud to the child evident in MEDICAL RECORDS showing premeditated intent to conceal a FEDERAL TRUST and duties of a FEDERAL TRUST by the primary obligee, upon repudiation in written statements of 2003 publications to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice alleged.

Felony perjury is evident in the December 2001 COURT ORDER, a fact of trial and default then made, fixing the fact for test and evidence in DISCOVERY conditional conviction; owing full authority of the indictment as per the BRONSTON DEFENSE and felony nature of the claim alleged against the party as an Oklahoma State resident to damage recovery and deceive the public in premeditated admitted child kidnapping and fraud by barratry to obtain over $100,000 USD in Federal Benefits and entailment impairing right of travel and employment valued at over $2 million USD.

Responive image

Copyright © 2024 - SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C.