PROCESS OF FRAUDS

The court arrived at a case concerning OCT 1 2001 filing on alleged abandonment of a child under the age of 15 years, legally a felony not entitled hearing in a State Civil District Court against a State of Oklahoma Resident (now legally INDIAN TERRITORY).

This case (01-17702) was technically improper, a GRAND JURY INDICTMENT required to file such claim per 21 Okla. Stat. Sec. 21-853.

Pursuant to such illegality of prosecution, a Bronston Defense (1973) was executed, owing a LEGAL ANSWER to the court of "NO", and "NO SUCH CHILD". The child alleged was a birth in DALLAS TX, known to be born to Veronica Marie Petersen, a mentally ill diagnosed woman, who attempted suicide prior, after signing over her child for payment of her debt exceeding $10,000 USD; and such child born in City of Carrollton, County of Denton, State of Texas - already subject to such CONTRACT made prior and fully paid, for residency in Pontotoc County (INDIAN TERRITORY, then STATE OF OKLAHOMA).

BRONSTON DEFENSE (1973) VIOLATED

The Bronston Defense obligates that the INDICTMENT, as phrased and to the subject matter only, be given legal answer in filing - which was done. On three hearings, the accuser did not appear, owing default to JAMES ALLEN. However, Judge Dee Miller did not allow default, and refused to allow witnesses and evidence be presented in absence of the accuser, contrary admitting hearsay as evidence in prior appearance of Veronica Marie Petersen, a KELLEY v KELLEY (2007) violation and 42 U.S. Code § 1981 federal law violation.

On DECEMBER 18th 2001, Judge Dee Miller issued ORDER that the child was born in DALLAS TX to Veronica Marie Petersen, and that such child must be subjected on motion of the DEFENDANT to paternity testing. This would and did prove fraud in the case. Judge Dee Miller did then conceal such fraud, by delay and then by accepting a MOTION TO AMEND the case 01-17702.

ILLEGAL RETROACTIVE MOTION ATTEMPT

A MOTION TO AMEND is immediate, not retroactive, and has no power to change the case purpose or alter the prior indictment after answer.

Judge Dee Miller did improperly alter the prior DECEMBER 2001 ORDER and OCT 1 2001 indicment, in felony degree barred by Title 8 Sec. 37.09 and 37.10 rule.

A NUNC PRO TUNC AMENDMENT (Latin: Now for Then) may alter facts of prior record retroactively, but only to correct mistake and where it shall not PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANT or alter the case purpose. This was neither a NUNC PRO TUNC AMENDMENT done, in name, nor other Judge's Amendment, and thus fraud is evident as naked fraud by STATE OF TEXAS in this matter and in case 01-17702.

Case 01-17702 was not withdrawn in any filing, and abandoned illegaly, ending OCT 1 2002 by a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT for the DEFENDANT by operation of law.

Case 01-17702-R was created, and a rushed trial applying the prior altered evidence as if proof of a crime applied, to amend (Additively) the new person of a Carrollton TX birth to the case, which is joinder after indictment, and naked fraud.

ORDER 01-17702-R was created May 29 2002, which assigned payments in a Judge's Order as if a UNITED STATES DEBT to a non-UNITED-STATES party, "Veronica Marie Petersen", a private natural person. This would cause substantial fraud.

Prior to OCT 1 2001 initial filing, this Carrollton TX (County of Denton) child was subject to a prior fully paid custody contract, and thus any new contract is a violation of UCC Sec. 2-302 known to be a violation also of Okla. Stat. Title 12A Sec. 12A-2-302, and a void contract.

The prior case 01-17702-R concluded before the default 1 year period of OCT 1st 2001 to OCT 1st 2002 permitted for case 01-17702; and did not adjudicate the prior indictment, leaving it the senior matter on the Chose of Action "ABANDONMENT" claim, and event in Chose of Action sole birth of a child by Veronica Marie Petersen.

VIOLATION OF ORE TENUS RULE

Ore Tenus Rule bars the claim later that a child of the same name as the DALLAS TX child was born in CARROLLTON TX to Veronica Marie Petersen, at the same time on the same day, legal impossibility and absurdity of law. The prior DALLAS TX ore tenus rule is LEGAL FACT, per DECEMBER 18 2001 ORDER. Later claims are perjury, thus, in the prior or later, owing void per Restatement of Unjust Enrichment and Restituiton §1 and §3 and § 32.

In AFFIDAVIT filed by Veronica Marie Petersen, the plaintiff claimed to live with her mother in The Colony, Denton County; while she plead in aggravated perjury that she did reside in County of Dallas, State of Texas to gain standing to sue. This concealed her abduction of a child prior resident in County of Dallas during Interstate travel by use of threat and force and threat of injury to the child - for removal and concealment alleged then to be County of Denton and home of Iva Petersen since August 2001.

In AFFIDAVIT filed in July 27 2015, Veronica Marie Petersen did admit she had not lived in County of Dallas since the year 2001 - and thus her filing of a motion for a new case in the year 2002 was void and lacked standing to sue.

The party Veronica Marie Petersen was suing then was a resident of Pontotoc County, State of Oklahoma (now INDIAN TERRITORY). There were no parties resident in County of Dallas to give rise to case 01-17702 or case 01-17702-R.

MULTIPLE ILLEGAL PROSECUTIONS

The prior is true also in the year 2018, when a third lawsuit was filed in County of Dallas IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS using the alias/fake-name "Veronica Peterson" to take up the same lawsuit 01-17702-R again in violation of immuinty and jurisdiction over the order then already ongoing from July 27 2015 to January 1 2020 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS. This act violated UIFSA Art. 3 Sec. 314 and TEXAS FAMILY CODE Sec. 157.375 'immunity' held by JAMES ALLEN to sue a person alleged to be JAMES ALLEN under the false plaintiff name and specifically under false DEFENDANT name also of 'James Arnold Allen' to work a fraud upon the court; whereby the DISTRICT COURT OF PONTOTOC COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA did alter this suit illegally and in error to "VERONICA PETERSON v JAMES ALLEN" in Nov 18 2018.

Prior such forgery, and suit of "James Allen" (a natural person, party to Public Law 59-234 CH 3335, 34 Stat., a collateral contract of 1907 with State of Oklahoma and United States); JAMES ALLEN had sued Veronica Marie Petersen in the year 2015 on July 27th.

Such suit, filed in DALLAS COUNTY due concealment of the child and false address, was granted VENUE TRANSFER of the case permanently in full to DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, where it was mutilated in preparation by COURT CLERK OF DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT as the lawsuit "MAGNUS VINCENT PETERSON v VERONICA MARIE PETERSEN", and altered on receipt to the style of suit "JAMES ALLEN v VERONICA PETERSEN", a mistake again owing correction refused by STATE OF TEXAS courts to carry on barratry simple.

CUSTODY CONTRACT PRIOR OCTOBER 2001

VERONICA PETERSEN is the original holder of 50% of the title of the Carrollton TX child, who sold that interest to JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN in the year 2001 August or prior, for payment of substantial bills incurred by her election to refuse insurance coverage of her child birth and for in-consideration transfer of sole custody to JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN, owner of the other 50% of the title, in concert with promise of non-interference and relocation to City of Ada, Oklahoma (now INDIAN TERRITORY).

VERONICA PETERSEN therefore had NO LEGAL CLAIM to sue or be party to any suit, and was a legal agent only in Law of Agency for the order 01-17702-R subject of such lawsuit, ascribed "Veronica Marie Petersen", a natural person - who did sign the JULY 27 2015 filed AFFIDAVIT.

Mental disturbance or perjury are evident upon the JULY 27 2015 filed AFFIDAVIT by Veronica Marie Petersen. Therein she twice names her child as "MAGNUS VINCENT PETERSON", a false legal name, commiting two counts of Title 8 Sec. 37.03 violation before the court prior any hearings.

At hearing, Veronica Petersen again uses hearsay claims wholly fabricated to deceive the court, directing that James Allen or the estate JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN is incapable of contract due to a fantasy ascribed by Veronica Petersen that testifies to the beliefs and state of mind of James Allen in absence of his person and without prior notice of this alleged claim before the hearing to the attorney of JAMES ALLEN; an introduction of a non-GERMAINE claim to prejudice the court and deflect from MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OF MENTAL ILLNESS known to all persons then and admitted as excuse for physical violence and acts of rage with injury to James Allen as POST PARTUM DEPRESSION in claims pleading to escape criminal charges for assault.

WRITTEN ADMISSION OF FRAUD

Larceny by misrepresentation is therefore evident, as a history of pathological lying and behavior suggest violent premeditated rage and written admission of fraud in the case, in "several writings", held out as MEMORANDUM by JAMES ALLEN showing the material representation of assent to the prior contract and acceptance of tender of funds, prior admission of bold lying as "I lied to you" in plain text, and disclosure of a polygamy relationship concealed from JAMES ALLEN to obtain value by misrepresentation subject STATUTE OF FRAUDS.

James Allen, the injured party, is a member of the agreement of 1907 Public Law 59-234 CH 3335, 34 Stat., terms sheet Article II Sec. II-6, known as Constitution of the State of Oklahoma; and entitled restitution regardless of obstruction or delay or other time passing, certain remedy void all Statutory Limitations of other laws.

CONCURRENT ILLEGAL PROSECUTION

Case 15-06292393 created IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY, on JULY 27 2015, did not cease prior JANUARY 1 2020; and did issue an ORDER MODIFYING THE ORDER to defraud JAMES ALLEN without due process, affecting order 01-17702-R.

Case 01-177202-R filed in 2018 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, ex juris to such case and in contempt of court to threaten the prosecution with false incarceration for bringing the prior case 15-06292393, was barred by CONTRACT NOT TO SUE for value paid in-consideration of promise not to sue by VERONICA PETERSEN in withdrawal of APPLICATION FOR CITATION OF CONTEMPT filed by JAMES ALLEN first in case 15-060292393 worked in payment in the year 2016, two years prior.

Threat by attorney Sally Pretorious and John Raggio that STATE OF TEXAS would act out-of-order and to thwart any right of CONTEMPT for JAMES ALLEN by operating a counter-suit of APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT and holding it superior to the prior exclusive of unconscionsable contract nature and threats, a violation of Restatement of Contracts (1981) Sec. 176; was coercion making void any right to compel JAMES ALLEN to withdraw his citation - and illegality of trial in 15-06292393 evident in violation of U.S. Policy (prohibition on prejudice to favor a resident of the home state over a foreign resident, Federal Register Vol 81 No 244 Dec 20 2016 pg 93492.

Case 01-177202-R was improerly filed, omitting the ORDER MODIFYING THE ORDER from case 15-06292393 created in 2016 on hearsay evidence in aggravated perjury; and thus void.

Case FR-2018-04 was created by UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT (UIFSA) to carry the case 01-177202-R into State of Oklahoma, where it was improperly filed in absence of the petitioner legal name and address required, and in absence of the ORDER MODIFYING THE ORDER, owing mistrial or void. Contrary fraud in barratry simple, this prosecution was maintained over objection from 2018 NOV 20 to 2023 and civil action in REGISTRATION OF A FOREIGN ORDER OF SUPPORT (prohibited by immunity, all civil action not originating in DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY first), to be made record. Demand for $41404.58 USD was void per DISCHARGE of the OBLIGATION worked in the year 2003 per "contract simple" of the order 01-17702-R; and by DISCHARGE obligated per Title 12A Sec. 12A-3-605(d) rule against JAMES ALLEN, to owe no obligation or payment for non-performance of any services or duties at any time and repudication and renunciation of order 01-17702-R on Sept 12 2003 by Veronica Marie Petersen in memorandum, while she expected payment regardless.

OBLIGATIONS by the Primary Obligor (Veronica Marie Peterseon) in a TRUST made by UNITED STATES through the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES so known and exclusively classified as debt owed to UNITED STATES for such class of benefit of the UNITED STATES as is "child support", do not extend to debt of private persons ("Veronica Marie Petersen").

Such works are obligated only to technical incorporated legal persons owned by UNITED STATES, as would be "VERONICA MARIE PETERSEN", who sold her shares prior application for benefits.

This matter is therefore abuse of a federal benefit alleged violation of 18 U.S. Code Sec. 666 and 42 U.S. Code Sec. 408(a) violations; using a non-human as beneficiary in a DALLAS TX child, barred by 1 U.S. Code Sec. 1.

CONCEALMENT PART OF COMMERCIAL THREATS

From 2001-2023, the abducting parties have utilized the possession of the Carrollton TX child to threaten and intimidate and attempt to influence the fiduciary of SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. of Okalhoma to give over money and property, evident in Sept 20 2003 "MEMORANDUM" of the delegated attorney of Veronica Marie Petersen explicitly and in ongoing demands; a felony alleged per 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1 to interfere in the trade among the States, in trade with foreign countries, and to do so in restriction of right to trade and marriage rights of JAMES ALLEN and all firms he is fiduciary for or with.

This conduct appears aided by "NTT/VERIO", "ZAYO GROUP INC.", "OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS" of George W. Soros (an investor in competitor brands and firms), and in nexus with the entity "PACKET CLEARING HOUSE" as a not-for-profit front of such companies activity with "EQUINIX" and "DIGITAL REALTY TRUST" of Dallas Texas, located at 2323 Bryan St and 1950 N Stemmons Freeway, and through front/shell company "IX NETWORKS LLC" of 11816 INWOOD RD #1115 DALLAS TX created in the year 2020 August by DONALD J. BEAL, the abductor and spokesperson of the child removal in AUGUST 2001 from the motor vehicle of JAMES ALLEN against the will and the instruction of the CUSTODIAL PARENT of the child at that time, for commercial advantage and engorgement of the prior firms using the child as a "collateral hostage in commerce", and for sale and operation of "TOP LEVEL DOMAIN NAME SERVER" infrastructure (TLD) by "PACKET CLEARING HOUSE" - employing such false unregistered names as "LOSTSERVER.NET" and "DEPREF.NET" and "CANADASUCKS.NET" and "LOOPBACK0.NETWORK" in TLD property - along with "JAMESARNOLDALLEN" variations to damage and disable global and interstate commerce of JAMES ALLEN in this action.

Concurrent cases in 01-17702 and 01-17702-R make case 01-17702-R res judicata and void; and cases 15-06292393 and 01-177202-R known also as FR-2018-04 concurrent illegal cases - to render case 01-177202-R and FR-2018-04 as barratry simple and forgery to obtain transfer of a NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT in order 01-17702-R as debt of "Veronica Marie Petersen" by signature of "Veronica Peterson" and suit of a non-party/beneficiary/client of the JAMES ALLEN party in "James Arnold Allen" (a natural person, expressly not UNITED STATES in personality of legal name), to defraud and work a fraud upon the court allegedly by acts of employee(s) of STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

Conversion of the debt written to "Veronica Marie Petersen" is prohibited in explicit language of ORDER 01-17702-R, intended to prevent such debt being sold or lent to any party not acting as the exclusive agent of UNITED STATES in proper use of a "UNITED STATES" legal person as the intended obligee/primary-obligor of a trust.

MISUSE OF TITLE IV AGENCY FORM

Misuse of the form creates a non-lawful form of a debt falsely held out as TITLE IV AGENCY debt, and such term "child support" - a benefit of United States not granted such use or to any person for such purpsoe (See: 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1).

When a TITLE IV AGENCY pursues lawful "child support" the debt is held already by the UNITED STATES, and the TITLE IV AGENCY is per Federal Register Vol 81 No 244 pg 93492 an exclusive limited delegated entity commissioned by UNITED STATES to obtain it, a registered foreign agent in class of entity in any state that operates.

STATE OF OKLAHOMA has claimed in DF-121225, appeal of case FR-2018-04, that such entity is commissioned by STATE OF OKLAHOMA, in petition filing as "STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES", and disclosed it is impersonating a genuine TITLE IV AGENCY while repudiating and evading all February 21 2017 "REQUIRED STATE LAW" owing due for the operation of a TITLE IV AGENCY in State of Oklahoma upon tender and acceptance of over $1.5 billion USD in fiscal year 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and future - a conditional elected contract enjoined under the DIRECTOR OF THE TITLE IV AGENCY on authority of each State.

This makes the actions in collection illegal in case FR-2018-04, and alleged barratry simple. Demands in the sum of $41404.58 USD are in violation of contract simple, TEXAS FAMILY CODE Sec. 157.261 "Final Judgement", and both rules denote a maximum obligation of $500 USD prior fully paid constituting DISCHARGE of obligation against JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN on performance in the year 2003. All collection in 2004-2023 is therefore illegal, harassment, and violation of 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1692d. Sums over $500 USD violate 45 COMMON FEDERAL RULE § 303.6 maximum fine. Collection over 65% of net income in State income tax constitute violation of 42 U.S. Code Sec. 666(a)(10) rule, and work a collection owing void to order 01-17702-R for violation on demand and attempt to enforce of 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1673 rule.

TEXAS ADMITS FALSE BOOKS

All claims that any sum is owed are disclaimed by STATE OF TEXAS in WARRANT issued Sept 27 2023, admitting fraudulent books, filed Sept 29 2023 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PONTOTOC COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

Balance upon such WARRANT shows fraud in false counter-offer as if a legal balance of lawful books, owing prosecution for theft of paid-in funds over the $500 maximum total amount; prior admitted in 2019 during discovery.

Harassment in all communication is evident, in threat of arrest and prosecution for false debt of UNITED STATES, pursuant to 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1692d.

Order 01-17702-R violates federal Law in its demand that payments be done without right to dispute, a violation of 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1692g.

Void is owed per Oklahoma Constitution Article XXIII sec. XXIII-9.

Void is owed per Oklahoma Constitution Article XXIII sec. XXIII-8 also, in primogeniture and due process and excessive fines rule, and attempt to work an extradition to return abducted children whom the order alleges were subject to POSSESSION, a right by law not privilege or to be confused with VISITATION or other lesser legal term.

LEGAL CONSPIRACY PER FEDERAL LAW

All persons involved in this abuse are alleged parties in 42 U.S. Code Sec. 408(a)(9) activity of felony degree, owing right of immediate protection amid threat of murder and arson, and in the death by fire of witnesses DECEMBER 25 2022 in their home.

Impersonation of witnesses including the dead witness May 2nd 2022, by use of false COURT DOCUMENTS to claim that a GUARDIANSHIP exists which does not, are felony aggravated perjury by the abducting parties to defraud on a global and national scale.

United States Law prohibits concurrent cases which are not incorporated under cross-prosecution, as required by UIFSA Article 3 rule, refused in case FR-2018-04 to conduct itself without respect to case 15-06292393 and extinguish that case by harassment of the prosecution of that case.

VERONICA MARIE PETERSEN is the agent of "Veronica Marie Petersen" per case 15-06292393, and thus "VERONICA PETERSEN" cannot be an "innocent party" (nonjoinder) in case FR-2018-04; as claimed March 16 2023 to move for dismissal of hearings out-of-order and superior to the evidence presented in 45 COMMON FEDERAL RULE per section 302.56, served upon the TITLE IV AGENCY designated by STATE OF OKLAHOMA, owing LEGAL ANSWER or entry as facts of the Law of the Trial, an uncontested AFFIDAVIT.

Claims that this is due to State Policy not to enforce, while sustaining the REGISTRATION OF A FOREIGN ORDER OF SUPPORT without right to due process or nullification; is alleged barratry simple - and part of more serious alleged 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1 voilation owing $100 million USD fine to each incorporated entity acting in this matter separately, and $1 million USD fine to each person additionally acting in this offense.

CONTRACTS - (AIL)

There are two types of contract defects:

voidable contracts, and

unenforceable contracts

Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981) §7 Voidable Contrats

A voidable contract is one where one or more parties have the power, by a manifestation of election to do so, to avoid the legal relations created by the contract, or by ratification of the contract to extinguish the power of avoidance.

Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981) §8 Unenforceable Contracts

An unenforceable contract is one for the breach of which neither the remedy of damages nor the remedy of specific performance is available, but which is recognized in some other way as creating a duty of performance, though there has been no ratification.

Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981)

• §174 When Duress by Physical Compulsion Prevents Formation of a Contract
• §175 When Duress by Threat makes a Contract Voidable
• §176 When Threat is Improper
• §177 When Undue Influence Makes a Contract Voidable
• §178 When a Term is Unenforceable on Grounds of Public Policy
• §178 Bases of Policies Against Enforcement
• §186 Promise in Restraint of Trade
• §187 Non-Ancillary Restraints on Competition
• §188 Ancillary Restraints on Competition
• §189 Promise in Restraint of Marriage
• §190 Promise Detrimental to the Marriage Relationship
• §191 Promise Affecting Custody
• §200 Interpretation of Promise or Agreement
• §201 Whose Meaning Prevails
• §202 Rules of Aid in Interpretation
• §203 Standards of Preference in Interpretation
• §204 Supplying an Omitted Essential Term
• §205 Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
• §206 Interpretation Against the Draftsman
• §207 Interpretation Favoring the Public
• §208 Unconscionable Contract or Term
• §250 When a Statement or an Act Is Repudiation
• §251 When a Failure to Give Assurance May Be Treated as a Repudiation
• §252 Effect of Insolvency
• §253 Effect of a Repudiation as a Breach on Other Party's Duties
• §254 Effect of Subsequent Events on Duty to Pay Damages
• §255 Effect of Repudiation as Excusing the Non-Occurrence of a Condition
• §256 Nullification of Repudiation or Basis for Repudiation
• §257 Effect of Urging Performance in Spite of Repudiation
• §261 Discharge by Supervening Impracticality
• §262 Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance
• §263 Destruction, Deterioration or Failure to Come into Existence of Thing Necessary for Performance
• §264 Prevention by Governmental Regulation or Order
• §265 Discharge by Supervening Frustration
• §266 Existing Impracticality or Frustration
• §267 Effect on Other Party's Duties of a Failure Justified by Impracticality or Frustration
• §268 Effect on Other Party's Duties ofa Prospective Failure Justified by Impracticality or Frustration
• §272 Relief Includes Restitution
• §364 Effect of Unfairness
• §365 Effect of Public Policy
• §373 Restitution When Other Party Is in Breach
• §375 Restitution When Contract Is Within Statute of Frauds
• §376 Restitution When Contract Is Voidable
• §377 Restitution in Cases of Impracticality, Frustration, Non-Occurrence of Condition or Disclaimer by Beneficiary
• §380 Loss of Power of Avoidance by Affirmance
• §381 Loss of Power of Avoidance by Delay
• §382 Loss of Power to Affirm by Prior Avoidance
• §383 Avoidance in Part
• §384 Requirement That Party Seeking Resitution Return Benefit
• §385 Effect of Power of Avoidance on Duty of Performance or on Duty Arising Out of Breach

The false claims that the contract (01-17702-R) is voidable without restitution is false on the grounds of Restitution (Second) of Contracts (1981) §376,

A party who has avoided a contract on the ground of lack of capacity, mistake, misrepresentation, duress, undue influence or abuse of a fiduciary relation is entitled to restitution for any benefit that he has conferred on the other party by way of part performance or reliance.

PARTIES INVOLVED

It is therefore oblvious because money was paid by JAMES ALLEN over objection and citation of STATUTE OF FRAUDS and violation of Title 12A Okla. Stat. Law Sec. 12A-1-308 reserved rights made in 1907 agreement with the 60th Congress of the United States for entry of State of Oklahoma into the federal Union and ratification of such Constitution pursuant to Public Law 59-234 CH 3335, 34 Stat., Sec. 3 and 21 and 22, all payments and interest and fees and costs owing return with interest upon that sum; and loss of other rights as Punitive Tort allow in 76 O.S. § 76-1, 76-3, 76-4, 76-6, 76-8 and 21 O.S. §21-748.2 civil counter-suit for debt bondage and peonage and forced labor demands issued by Veronica Marie Petersen, Donald Beal, Iva Petersen, Alicia McMahon, PACKET CLEARING HOUSE and NTT/VERIO partnership known as LOSTSERVER.NET with Donald Beal, and damages against their sponsor OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS in such criminal human trafficking activity to defraud United States and State of Oklahoma in anti-competitive practices and interference in suffrage rights of persons and tampering with a fiduciary in the "STRYX" product dilution and "BEYOND WAR" product dilution as NVIDIA CORPORATION "BEYOND RTX" and ASUS COMPUTERS "STRIX" and ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES "STRIX POINT" and "STRIX HALO" derived technologies from previous 1998-2006 SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. prototype distributed ray tracing and game engine systems.

Top Level Domain Providers "PACKET CLEARING HOUSE", "ZAYO GROUP INC. (A subsidiary of EGT GROUP AB of Sweden)", "COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC.", "KEIF-LP Enid OK" and sister Station "PLANO COMMUNITY RADIO" aka "VIRTBIZ.COM" aka "GEBHARDT BROADCASTING LLC", and "EQUINIX" and "DIGITAL REALTY TRUST" and "FAIRWAY INDEPENDENT MORTGAGE" companies operating in State of Texas, jointly, under "IX NETWORKS LLC" as a shell company and "IXP" registration of companies as "PeerDB" franchise of NTT/VERIO operated clandestinely via "PACKET CLEARING HOUSE" and with other companies financial support of unlawful less-than-arms-length transaction activity with anti-competitive abuse of this TRUST barred by 15 U.S. Code Sec. 1 and 42 U.S. Code Sec. 408(a) rule; are named liable and organized unregistered labor nexus in this dispute on concealment of a child, fraud in presentation of a false birth for United States benefits, and harassment including Threats against the Allen Family to coerce submission to a criminal fraud and child snatching for commercial advantage.

Use of "OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS" finances and $240 million USD per year spending of "PACKET CLEARING HOUSE" sponsored by "OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS" and "NTT/VERIO", indicate an Oklahoma Constitution Article XXIII Section XXIII-1A labor organization obligated colletive liability in this action to take, conceal, abuse, deceive, and injure the Carrollton Texas child born to JAMES ALLEN in the year 2001, seized from federal highway during Interstate contracted fully paid transit in this interest and foreign unregistered industrial sabotage activity using TLD privileges to extort, blackmail, and conceal the child from 2001-2023.

Restitution

Restatement (Third) of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution (2011), §1 and §3 prohibit this activity against SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. and members of its licensed products documented in 2013-2023 letters threatening to 3 separate firms and in January 28 2022 and October 5 2022 of explicit criminal demands for $70000 USD.

§ 1. Restitution and Unjust Enrichment

A person who is unjustly enriched at the expense of another is subject to liability in restitution.

§ 3. Wrongful Gain

A person is not permitted to profit by his own wrong.