ARGUMENT
UIFSA Sec 301, 306, and 314 Violation Settlement
Whereby a criminal and unlawful levy and threat of lien on the body of the living agent as collateral was levied by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA; contrary 586 U.S. _____ (2019) case no 17-1091 pronouncement expressly barring such claims by the Civil State and Federal Court that they be UNCONSTITUTIONAL and exceed the power of such court, and 4th and 14th AMENDMENT violations, styled EXCESSIVE FINES, BONDAGE AND SLAVERY, CRUEL AND UNUSUAL, and refused any use of property obtained or maintained by reserves set in 15 U.S.C. § 1673 or 45 CFR § 302.56(f), §303.6, §303.100(a)(3) citation of the prior Federal Statute firmly done; and a duty of the State per payment of FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244 issued Dec 20 2016, effective February 2017 or where specified and limited Federal Exemption Ruling and limited time to apply now passed;
The injured party seeks for November 2018 to February 2022 unlawful violation of UIFSA Section 314 "immunity" refused and concealed in March 11 2015 to January 24 2020 case already obligated prior protection from such abuse, refused hearing in such case, and CITATION refused on threat to violate there also such "immunity" in TEXAS FAMILY CODE §157.375; to sustain a fraud on 5th AMENDMENT "double jeopardy" executed in 2002 March-May; for which a "final judgment" then created July 1 2002 void all claims over $500 USD by "operation of law" a product of TEXAS FAMILY CODE express use of 42 U.S.C. §666(a)(9) rule; a duty of STATE OF TEXAS, done like an incompetent parie dog to the defeat of their entire claim on face and fully paid on first notice in full; then sustained as a fraudulent interstate debt; for which the criminal FOREIGN STATE did deny all duty to Federal Law contrary $720 million payment per year from 2001-2022; and destroy records to conceal their 2nd and 3rd trial in which the defendant was denied the right to cross examine or face his accuser and all right to call his witnesses.
Duing such time did the STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA wrongly and criminally threaten the defendant with false incarceration, forced labor, and civil death demanding he pay illegal sums of money barred by 45 CFR §302.0 and §303.0 rule; in false AGENCY and to deny 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and §706 duty to open an investigation formally on "fraud" and make restitution in full - in effort to outlast the statute of limitations and in concealment violating POSSESSION right to the child of the defendant; taken from his FOREIGN DOMICILE and during INTERSTATE TRAVEL for INTERSTATE COMMERCE then by FRAUD, FORCE, AND THREAT OF MURDER initiated and carried by no commissoned officer of either State or any recognized authority, and such act on INTERSTATE 35 and 75, acts of highwaymen to interfere with the rights of a United States Citizen alleged 18 U.S.C. §241 violation sustained and pledged in letters from 2001-2022 and by overt act of sustaining such illegal hold and publication to knowingly deny the INHERENT RIGHTS (76 O.S. §76-1) of the Oklahoma Territory parent, damage their reputation (§76-6), and to destroy their bond with their child (§76-8) who was registered legally to them and taken into the home of the same for over 70 days prior such violent alleged 21 O.S. §21-891 "child snatching".
Due to claims such abuse is protected as "civil" actions, or "collateral contract" for "forfeiture" of equity as if "Admiralty process in rem" a right to demand forfeiture of estate; or suffer loss of career and work rights and honors and licese, civil death; sustained in 2001-2021 in writing; the injured party seeks "ALLODIUM" over his living and legal person, business, intangible and real property in all respects; and to assert dominium directum et utile rights in ABSOLUTE DOMINION over such property, living and legal persons and industry en legis, a right arising from scrambling possession evident to overthrow his POSSESSION right, falsely style it as "visitation" - a legally distinct lesser privilege, and to actively deceive (76 O.S. §76-3) the public (76 O.S. §76-4) employing a labor organization and support by multiple company officers in that capacity and jointly made in 74 directed letters to attorneys in State of Oklahoma; admitting such conspiracy; themed "LOSTSERVER" labor group per Oklahoma Constitution Article XXIII section XXIII-1A; to overthrow the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma and dispose improperly of the rights of the injured parent and his firms contrary article XXIII-8 and XXIII-9 to create an implied labor contract between the injured parent and the State or United States.
WHEREBY, due to 2015-2020 and 2018-2022 failure to hold jury trial or afford HEARING compliant with 22 O.S. §22-13 in part 1, 2, and 3;
BE IT SO RESOLVED, the injured party is entitled and has filed a MOTION FOR ALLODIUM and dominium plenum (absolute ownership in sovereign trust pursuant to the Enabling of Statehood Act of 1906) in this matter, and to assert ABSOLUTE DOMINION, pursuant to the legal powers of title 76 section 76-9, "All Necessary Force";
BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED, this claim is of absolute dominion, styled dominium plenum; and predicated on the 2021 November 14th demands again circulated of "forfeiture" to suggest less than dominium navis in false "Admiralty process in rem" claims of an INTERSTATE nature and INTERNATIONAL FOREIGN ORIGIN in "Mainland China" and "Nation of Japan" equity (23% book "Government of Japan" ownership of the abusive firm in question) in interest and employment of such agent claims; jus ad bellum against the persons of the Indian Territory by those parties, and obligated no quarter per jus in re.
Malicious wrongdoing in subsection D class III violation of 23 O.S. §23-9.1 and 21 O.S. §21-748.2 civil counter-suit is not included and sustained in counter-claims for this fraud against the Oklahoma parties beyond the prior settlement option; including by direct action those States and Federal Employees, who by willful intentional false report themed alleged felony 18 U.S.C. §2071 violation incorporating §1589 violation by "abuse of the legal process" and "acts under color of law" barred by 22 U.S.C. §7102; did allegedly seek and fraudulently style the injured party non compos or incapable to conceal their TITLE IV grant fraud of $1.5 billion USD per year in 2001-2022 by STATE OF OKLAHOMA and $720 million USD per year in 2001-2022 by STATE OF TEXAS; alleged a violation in multiple counts on repeated denial and concealment of Oklahoma Statutory Code 43A O.S. §43A-5-104 to suspend 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 10th, and 14th AMENDMENT rights to carry the fraud in 2001-2022.
For which "The Enabling of Statehood Act" of 1906 obligate the incorporators of State of Oklahoma to the full written duties and laws made in minimum bylaw such terms expressly barring this abuse in two documents:
- The Declaration of Independence
- The Constitution of the united States of America.
Which means, like McGirt v State of Oklahoma: that those parties may separate themselves in "all necessary force" authority of (legal) force as well as other means; by absolute dominium and absolute ownership, on the violation of POSSESSION right exposed and carrying away of their child for concealment themed a perpetual hold without DUE PROCESS ;
And expressly as jus neccessitatis after five sepatate false trials following the 2001 December 14 default of the petitioner who took the child for 6th Amendment nonsuit and failure to appear;
And where a fact concealed and records destroyed by STATE OF TEXAS and DALLAS COUNTY to sustain such abuse over 2001-2002 in State of Texas and State of Oklahoma across State borders; and in public alleged aggravated perjury (Texas Statutory Code &ect;37.03) to FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS to obtain credit, employment, and in organized labor to overtake and take and sell in "FEDERAL CIVIL RULE 18(b) alleged FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE OF TITLE" such franchise and property of the injured parent and claims of patent and rights issued by the STATE OF OKALHOMA prior to him in 1998 and in power from 1998-2022 at law.
Attacking in such conduct the registered UNITED STATES CORPORATIONS of two other legal commissions; and as many vessels in INTERSTATE COMMERCE which they believed to be real or registered or public or well-known targets of the commercial fleet of the Oklahoma parent of the child.
With intent to overthrow both commission, land title, deed, real estate, and take possession for FAIRWAY INDEPENENT MORTGAGE of Texas, by a Vice President of that company named in the suit, who did conceal the child contrary such ORDER from 2002-2022 in concert with these acts and fraud.
The question rests on the ALLODIUM element, versus stronger language in dominium plenum;
WHEREBY the "free of feudal services and incidents" right suggest the taking of inheritance, right to work, civil honors is corruption of blood and a bill of attainder falsely passed and sustained by the State and Federal government;
And to constructively create a civil death if EXCESSIVE FINES are not paid; does not in 2001-2022 without DUE PROCESS then trigger an "exit clause";
From the United States (nation and jurisdiction), Federal Union, State of Oklahoma (State), Pontotoc County (region), and "City of Ada" (municipality) for all jurisdiction and claims of dominium utile themed then some implicit or express collateral contract affording any dominium directum or superior right, as described in "LEX REX IMERIALIS" by Chief Justice Fox (346 F.Supp. 119 (1972)(2));
In favor of jus neccessitas in perpetuity a legal and peaceful dominium plenum afforded the injured party detained 20 years by a designed engineered and aided collapse in full to make ex juris the person subjected to such fraud and their industry and name(s) in a complicit abandonment of the United States government and Justice system across all territories and states - an engineered fraud by State of Texas, and rebellion enjoined by State of Oklahoma and other States in their tacic complicity spanning August 11 2001 to present (2022 Feb).
Jus ex bello demands restitution (18 U.S.C. §1593) and removal of false claims (15 U.S.C. §1673c and §1692d, § 1692g, and duty of the State in §1692n). Further, restitution to "status quo ante bellum" is obligated.
Violation of UIFSA Section 301, 304, and 306 to refuse to forward such 45 CFR §302.56(f) rule to the appropriate court after accepting the case in Nov 2018; further violate the abuse in sustained false public allegation without 22 O.S. §22-13 relief or service on grant of trial from 2019-2022 themed in violation of UIFSA section 314 "immunity" of the DEFENDANT refused acknowledgement or removal on motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment not performed; in nonsuit having no REGISTRATION RULING also obligated a UIFSA case to then base any claims agaisnt the DEFENANT or allow "any defense" right specified in UIFSA rev 2008;
Thereby aiding and creating an illegal hold on the living and legal person by PONTOTOC COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY misconduct for PONTOTOC COUNTY and STATE OF OKLAHOMA;
While these legal matters are "above the table" so to speak from CITY OF ADA, the fact that the Incorporated City is the trustee for PONTOTOC COUNTY and holds and operates on the plan of such land themed in the complaint, makes the matter a legal question of public interst to residents in CITY OF ADA and businesses.
In essence, by suggesting illegal taking of property for false debt registered with CITY OF ADA, has PONTOTOC COUNTY and STATE OF OKLAHOMA and STATE OF TEXAS acted wrongly; injuring the City and contributing to its economic hardship from 2001-2022 in false cause, a child snatching and interdiction in INTERSTATE COMMERCE.
By the improper and malicious prosecution direction of STATE OF TEXAS and the OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, in aid to a written fraud violating their own alleged order, and to extort and gain commercial advantage in INTESTATE COMMERCE for foreign sovereign nations and their agency in the United States and outside the United States valued at over $40 billion USD and up to $67 billion USD cash in single transactions versus domestic firms prior established in Pontotoc County and State of Oklahoma, duly commissioned, and to the threat of false incarceration of their registered agent and the registered agent of a UNITED STATES CORPORATION in this activity refused relief or report of an alleged Hobbs Act Viotion for 20 years and despite sustained criminal extortion expressly barred in Title 78 and Title 21 section 21-1304;
And to refuse the duty obligated in 21 O.S. §21-1305; directing the victim to defend themselves at their own cost and sole authority - incorporating a sale of justice violating Oklahoma Constitution Article I-2, II-3, II-6, II-22 and II-32 monopoly claims central to such child concealment fraud.
On examiation of letters, contempt to violate Oklahoma Constitution Article XXIII section XXII-1A "RIGHT TO WORK" and incorporating as false collateral contract doctrine violating XXIII-8 and XXIII-9 rule, has the fraud sustained for 20 years to reach a term limit entitled dominium plenum and to sever the United States right to territory and property - in a bizarre recurrance of the Treaty of Pontotoc Creek and coercion there cited by the Great Chickasw Nation for such unfair and unjust taking of land.
See also: Treaty of Pontotoc Creek:
Copyright © 2022 - SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C.
