INDUSTRIAL MATTERS IN LEGAL QUESTION

Why harass persons whose capital asset position are less than $5 million USD to compel their silence in a global product launch, intellectual property claim on global brand sales activity date, or with intent to cause commercial and financial distress and harm their family and children?

Why not, would be the legal question, where sociopath or narcissistic personality disorders are enabled to act as spokespeople or officers of very large publicly traded securities?

Expecially where local, State, and Federal Law enforcement are more concern with the terrorism allegations without conviction of their political opposition in an unrestricted and irresponsible use of mass communication technology and claims.

Technical cause for concern exists when a product - pledged for 2 years - is delayed to increase shareholder price from $18/share to $300/share; and vendors (spec. EVGA CORPORATION in public statements) report price-fixing and undue control over their right to produce product without entereing into a foreign monopoly practice subjugating their company to a very large foreign capital or patent holder direction contrary ordinary antitrust laws.

When such product, in offer, has 3 expansion slots presented as 16 lane high speed channels; but pubilc audiences are not clearly informed that use of more than 1 of those slots or use with an M.2 high speed solid state drive themed essential to most systems design, will reduce those devices to 8x/8x/4x or lower from 16x/16x/16x expected by non-technical consumers.

Rational for this 20 lane design and lesser 18 lane "consumer" model; include that 8x lanes of 5.0 rated speed are as fast as 16x lanes of 4.0 speed.

When consumers are buying a product because it is perceived to be 200% faster than the prior 4.0 speed; without being informed of limitations preventing use of a common drive or multiple cards in the advertised and illustrated 2 and 3 ports; this presents a serious issue to Personl Computer integrators like "ADVANCED GAME SYSTEMS" (AGS) and SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. registered company brands in established tradename and trademark rights reliant on a quality of product, fitness of purpose, and "merchantability" passed on to resellers as a potential consumer perception of defect not evident in design and limitations not present in "Enterprise" class products over $2000 per component (3-4x consumer price).

As fast as "the prior generation" is not a marketing point. It is a failure.

While some components in isolated designs may perform at the 200% increase in potential, software developers cannot rely on the minority market share of the "ideal" configuration, and products must be designed to function in the limited envelope of "common majority consumer market hardware" to perform as advertised on common and ordinary systems.

SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. thus has a direct and established interest in this conduct as a global industry activity disclosed in September 16th 2022 and September 21st 2022 notices to th public for key system component vendors.

Harassment to suppress this information, and direct instruction to persons who receive the "evaluation product" for reviews and influencer promotion prior date of sale, report that restrictions in their access terms appear to be influential to non-disclosure of this evident technology design limitation; similar to prior language used by GAMES WORKSHOP GROUP in alleged Non-Disclosure-Agreement publications circulated on REDDIT, drawing criticism of misuse of contract to limit or harm ordinary independent review of product and damage critics explicitly through discrediting and severance of ordinary equal access and independent consumer reviews.

Customers of the prior services for goods recall this matter in the issue of paid protection in CONSUMER REVIEW product listings and public business listings, which exposed a fairly negative aspect to social media abuse and entrapment of ordinary public businesses and manufacturers in the United States in prior decades.

Conditional reviews or punitive action for unfavorable review are not a lawful practice in the United States; nor is retaliation by any "insider" (employee of any industrial group or site) such as a systems administrator or Vice President of Systems Architecture at a facility where "exclusive" product such as the NVIDIA CORPORATION data center enterprise class devices are being offered preferentially or in pre-release, exposed in September 21st 2022 public demonstration and citation of such work.

NVIDIA CORPORATION is not our concern, mainly, despite a positive and anticipated citation of technology derived from NEXT LIMIT ray tracing and preview technology of LUXOLOGY LLC and Steve Worley Labs early work for NEWTEK LIGHTWAVE3D; which SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C. is a contracted licensee of and early-adoptor involved in software based solutions then made into hardware in the NVIDIA product line for consumer use.

Our concern is as a MANUFACTURER of quality computers reliant on vendors with a proven track record and superior RMA history, like EVGA CORPORATION, whom we rely on to make our extended 10-year service plan and life cycle recycling programs operate in 1998-2022.

Fraud to abuse our relationship and attack our credit, creditors, and reputation in an organized and clear fashion by employees of a "data center" in Dallas Texas or Reykjavik Iceland or Copenhagen Denmark in 2022 during April-September 2022 negotiations and final decision to force EVGA CORPORATION out of the Graphic Card Market, make the performance and speed limitations evident in motherboard manufacturers shown in the 670E and 670 and 650E series central to our business activity prior launch October 2022 of such product and release to consumers.

Based on consumer expectations, which we find reasonable, to suggest that a PCIe 5.0 implementation shall be 200% of the theoretical maximum speed of PCIe 4.0 solutions, similar use, and applications geared toward that involving both graphics co-processor peripheral cards and high-performance data and operating system drives necessary to a class of customer applications; we are not satisfied with a "half speed version" to match the 4.0 specification in correct build for Enterprise customers; or the price setting which appears to be present in the withholding of technology by disabling devices to create an Enterprise-only market space for professional companies with over $5 million USD in assets exclusively.

Especially where such firms are engaging then in business practices to threaten litigation for report of these findings, decisions, and our refusal to endorse their product offering in our branded products as a solution.

Oklahoma constitution Article XXIII-1A prohibits retaliation for failure to endorse a product or a right to do business be impaired or denied in publication or communication as LEGAL FACT on the failure to obtain the endorsement of a foreign corporation, labor union, workers, or companies of a legally seaparate company. Such violation is a crime, so specified by the Oklahoma Constitution, and thus a "high crime" which would be paramount to serious offense by nature and even enjoin "treason" against persons or the public; whereby treason against the "state" is separate from such claim and not the sole party who is subject such complaint. It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL activity, in the least, and a clear duty of protection that goes beyond the "civil" burden of private suit, to obligate City, State, and Federal protection at no cost to the victim.

Clearly, a small firm or reviewer cannot threaten to impair the right to sell, ability to make public offer, or solicitation ability of a large corporation.

The reverse, to suggest a large firm with control over media or by harassment to terminate or deplatform a reviewer, local producer, manufacturer in an open market, or credit for such business or relationship with its creditors, is not true - and a pattern of such actions would fall under Criminal offense, as well as be entitled civil action without respect to a duty to carry out such suit prior to enjoying protection from activity barred by criminal code (Title 8 in State of Texas, Title 21 in State of Oklahoma, Title 18 in United States in any matter across State Borders to injure or impair civil rights).

While these "failure to launch the product described or suited to our purpose" contrary prior pledge or ability to technically create such product, we are receiving reports of future "downsizing" and "imposed limitations" on devices to further create market price controls by the $44 billion capital firm.

October 7th 2022, unconfirmed report that 4060 series card designs for 2023 release would be expressly limited to 8x lanes, even when used in ideal 16x lane configurations, to encourage value in 4070 and 4080 series cards; came ss a serious technical limitation having no evident legal purpose other than to impair consumers and damage planned and future equivalence across the product spectrum to compel sale of higher ticket items over economical replacements in supply chain planning and generational I/O standards and practices.

While we hope these unconfirmed rumors are not true, or suggest some claim that speeds over 8x 5.0 PCIe would be unavailable to the hardware or memory or other part of the device; it suggests that the higher priced alternatives of the same design are equally limited, or a differnt model chip is being used in the two devices which will confuse consumers.

Consumers are confident when they by a 40xx or 30xx device, the chip used and architecture is similar, other than memory and grade of core density. Initial reports to suggest claim of use of two different architectures to contain differing "feature capabilities" against which software developers rely to create uniform experience in real-time interactive softwre and media, are exceptionally alarming.

Until release date, and retail product testing, we cannot confirm such claims - but have increased our product testing planning and halted the deployment of 40xx cards and 6xx chipsets until further informtion can be obtained to confirm initial published and express claims on sites like NEWEGG and AMAZON.COM offers.

Belief in these practices, following the 2018-2022 merger talks and related patent implications of a Chinese-Owned company brokered by Nation of Japan to enjoin United States patents vital to national defense, cited as concern by the United Kingdom in review of the merger - do not arise in further activity by NVIDIA CORPORTION, data center buyers, or letters like the one received October 5 2022 to openly extort and seek undue foreign influence over the estate and assets of creditors in PONTOTOC COUNTY to harm their civil contract or obligations to destablize a technical review of NVIDIA CORPORATION, damage intellectual property registration, or harm such claims to afford a public October 7 2022 launch to sell product into Oklaoma using those well established marks which have not been challenged since 2013 and are thus legally beyond contest as of 2022.

This conduct, which appears to have nexus in SWEDEN, NORWAY, AUSTRAI, ICELAND, UNITED KINGDOM, MN, MI, CA, NY, TX, and FL State asset of the parties; use of domain names, and presence of COGENT COMMUNICATIONS to carry such threats and false commercial use of records to extort in October 5 2022 letter; show a serious misconduct subject Federal crimina complaint if they persist in any way either by civil action to accomplish threats of criminal coercion or in any other form of improper use of REGISTERED TRADEMARKS to dilute the brand of a prior established and well known Oklahoma firm in-legal-use since 1992 public COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY and in PUBLIC ADVERTISING and CONTRACT available for the court showing interference with businesses of THE GREAT CHICKASAW NATION and their clients in INDIANT TERRITORY or PONTOTOC COUNTY.