Sept 29th 2022

Guide to Competitor Fraud Claims


A pattern of criminal narcissistic abuse typical of RACIST WHITE SUPREMACIST claims in TEXAS NATIONALIST FASHION are evident in PETERSEN v ALLEN (FR-18-04).

Among these are classic "Crazy Indian" claims, "ethnic traits and appearance linked to characterization of a mental health deficiency", "eugenic claims to suggest parental family are a proof of (adopted) children's defect", and "characterization of physical health and injury as emotional disorders" to defraud.


Over other clearly racist acts, there are also "class based Marxist frauds" evident in the seizure, abuse, taking, and effort to "wholly obliterate the character and history" of the Oklahoma Parent.

One such fraud is "majority fact finding", whereby the party employs the incompetence of the court to rely on peer witnesses against an accused person by quantity without CROSS EXAMINATION to impeach the quality of claims by a lynch mob in its direction and objective.

As one abudctor put it, "You don't have any friends" was the justification suggesting that the abduction and abuse of a child would be accomplished without the public recognizing that the mental health fraud was criminal fraud by a group of competitors against a small business owner to seize property and use a child as a collateral to do so over a very long period of time during which all due process was denied - a KELLY v KELLY (2007 OK Sup Court) rule violation creating "automatic mistrial" conditions.


The public, not familiar with very large economic business and enterprise industry - which is predicated on "intellectual property" such as "trademark" and "trade secret" and other reasonable 4th Amendment protections in privacy; are victims of this organized union labor fraud and foreign money laundering activity enjoined with PETERSEN v ALLEN claims against Oklahoma businesses.

The prior "socialist" extremist groups, eager to overcome laws against themselves and their actions, have resorted to styling the Oklahoma business as "inferior" and "not real" and "qualifying their right to legally exist" in Unconstitutional and criminal acts (XXIII-1A OK Const).

A sub-$5 million corporation has equal right to its property and title as a $6 trillion corporation or its subsidiaries and partners before the law; or those rights and titles have no legal authority in their commission as pledges of equal protection (42 U.S. Code 1981) in the United States.

Because many of the financial and private investors in these "hostile foreign firms" are from countries other than the United States or are by career and experience organized criminals, experienced in money laundering and international transfers of high value book assets under color of other business activity, the claims at law of "Equal Protection" often are ignored while being spoken over to deceive the public to act against the Laws of the United States with the foreign or insurrectionist organization and its agents.

This effort to overrun the defending domestic agent is "treason", "sedition", "rebellion", and "insurrection" by United States Citizens and officers of the Courts of the member states of the Federal Union and United States employees; and foreign acts of war themed "genocide" under any external entity or office.


The fraud relies on the presumption that local custom (Common Law) shall overrule Statutory Law or Constitutional Law; and to impose a "precedent decision" rule in TITLE IV AGENCY and TITLE IV PROGRAM activity prior 2017 January; continued into 2017-present (5 years after the Law changed in Fed Reg Vol 81 No 244).

The States, in-consideration of payments of $700 million and $1.5 million USD in Texas and Oklahoma, "voluntarily elected to waive their State Sovereign Rights and contracted to change their laws and enforcement to comply with 45 CFR laws set forth with instructions in the United States formal service of process publication, FEDERAL REGISTER, volume 81 Number 244, as od December 20 2016".

The States, in their sovereign authority, submitted to comply with this rule and to void all laws not consistent with this new set of rules - and further to undertake agenda time by the State Legislature to pass new laws to comply with the CFR rule made fully. Their power as TITLE IV AGENCIES in "delegated, limited, and exclusive power granted solely by the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the UNITED STATES established under 5 U.S. Code section 101, is not extended beyond those specified rights in the Federal Rules to be made State Laws.

To fail to comply is to defraud the Federal Grant, a 31 U.S. Code section 3729(a) violation subject repayment of the grant, and payment to the victim(s) of a portion of those moneys for fraud. Themed $40 billion USD or more now in 2022 by PETERSEN v ALLEN on sustained demands affording false claims in 2001-2022 as subject to present law and customs for enforcement - entitled full remedy - per 5 U.S. Code section 706.

The Court may not "doubt" the claims of a DEFENDANT, as sole defense, per 45 CFR 302.56(f) rule. The Burden of Proof is upon the State to show false claims on RECORD, not compel the DEFENDANT to make statements which the court is entitled a judgement of opinion or confidence. This makes the application of such case a fraud under FEDERAL GRANT as a TITLE IV JUDICIAL HEARING upon false defense of the State without evidence or a legal basis for their obstruction of recovery of a missing and exploited child to extort control over a registrered prior-existing and established business and its franchise rights.

State Sovereign Immunity Claims

Pursuant to FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244, the state has duly eleted for payment of a FEDERAL GRANT, to comply. The employees who do not are liable personally for civil suit regardless, per 588 U.S. _____ Case 17-647, and not protected by Soverein State or Federal immunity in acts prohibited by the commission of their office.

Rejection of this by Texas residents holding, concealing, and defrauding the child are "rebellion", "insurrection", "sedition", and "treason".

Where the government, Legislature of the State, Governor, Attorney General, Director of any agency made by the same, or their agents on their instruction acting in their capacity deny this - as official policy of State of Texas or State of Oklahoma, that state is in "formal rebellion and insurrection" against the United States - a declared enemy combatant of the United States and its officers by acts or deed or dereliction of duty on invocation of rule - and alien to the commission of the United States and its territories at law in full.

The Remedy Clause in 1906 Statehood

Pursuant "The Enabling of Statehood Act" of 1906, should State of Oklahoma seperate from the Federal Union in such a fashion, it shall cease to exist and be dissolved. Pursuant to the 1907 adoption of Oklahoma Constitution Article I section I-1, such act shall dissolve also the Federal Union among the many member states and forfeit their book assets to the injured party as "Full Faith and Credit" not entitled resumption as seperate private sovereign states; as specified in the incorporated rider agreement and construction of words there made to "The Enabling of Statehood Act", styled: "The Constitution of the united States of America" and explicitly also "The Declaration of Independence of the united States of America".

This is "Operation of Law" in "Construction of Words", and acts make legal fact in all such cases of breach. Read the contract next time. If the missing child has been removed from the United States, to a foreign state, without due process specified in KELLY v KELLY rule (2007 OK Sup Court); the breach is evident on their discovery and removal regardless of age of majority under such 2001 taking and concealment from HABEAS CORPUS prohibited in Article II rights of the Oklahoma family seeking ORDERED POSSESSION and INHERENT RIGHTS enjoining a duty to return a missing and stolen child.

Claim Child Belonged to No One

Fraud to claim the child had no legal bond in kidnapping to conceal them by the TEXAS abductors, violates Oklahomna Constitution Article II-2 (INHERENT RIGHTS) in Title 76 Section 76-1, 76-3, 76-6, and 76-8 enumerated rights. Further Article II-3 and II-4 are violated by the fraud to suggest dissent with this abuse are "mental illness" to escape DUE PROCESS.

The child (born in Denton County) was RELEASED BY MEDICAL ORDER to the custody of both parents by the hospital; and all title made on a second fabricated LEGAL CHILD (born in Dallas County) was fraud to abduct and repeal the previous ORDER and 2502 Live Oak St #335 HOME ADDRESS of such child concealed to abduct the child from Dallas County to Denton County during scheduled paid agreed and planned one-way INTERSTATE COMMERCE CONVEYANCE OF PHYSICAL CHATTEL to PONTOTOC COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA jurisdiction - interdicted by kidnapping on a Federal Highway to overcome the Oklahoma parent. Such taking included KIDNAPPING of the vehicle owner and child on threat to harm the child at that time by VERONICA PETERSEN, and removal of the child from possession by force and threat done then by DONALD J BEAL in witness of CHRISTOPHER MELTON MAIDT of Nichols Nichols Hills, Oklahoma.

This act was later alleged "abandonment" by the abudctors, and confessed fraud in 2003 and 2011 in writing refused relief by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA employees to defraud the TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES and sustain the fraud and public hoax with extortion aspects against INTERSTATE COMMERCE styled XXIII-1A "Right to Work" organized union criminal activity of a foreign unregistered agency now evident in 2323 Bryan St Dallas Texas letters of extortion.

These acts violate Oklahoma Constitution Artile II-2, and in total 23 of 37 Articles of the Oklahoma Bill of Rights; and 3 Articles of the MISC section of ARTICLE XXIII section XXIII-1A, XXIII-8 and XXIII-9. For a total of 26 Federal felony acts evident on review of the case record. Additional Federal Constitutional Rights in 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 10th, 1and 14th Amendment raise that violation to 33 counts alleged 18 U.S. Code section 241 violation ongoing in 2001-2022 fraud.

Inherent rights.
All persons have the inherent right to life, liberty, the
pursuit of happiness, and the enjoyment of the gains of their own
industry.  (See Title 76 Oklahoma Statutory Code, for enumerated 
specific "INHERENT RIGHTS" of a person and children and in reputation, 
publicity, public fraud, and interference in family bonds and releif 
afforded 76-8 and 76-9.  See also 22 O.S. §22-31 rule.)

Right of assembly and petition.
The people have the right peaceably to assemble for their own
good, and to apply to those invested with the powers of government
for redress of grievances by petition, address, or remonstrance.

Interference with right of suffrage.
No power, civil or military, shall ever interfere to prevent the
free exercise of the right of suffrage by those entitled to such

Courts of justice open - Remedies for wrongs - Sale, denial or delay.
The courts of justice of the State shall be open to every
person, and speedy and certain remedy afforded for every wrong and
for every injury to person, property, or reputation; and right and
justice shall be administered without sale, denial, delay, or

Due process of law.
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law.

Excessive bail or fines - Cruel or unusual punishment.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines
imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishments inflicted.

Habeas corpus - Suspension.
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall never be
suspended by the authorities of this State.

Imprisonment for debt.
Imprisonment for debt is prohibited, except for the non-payment
of fines and penalties imposed for the violation of law.

Bills of attainder - Ex post facto laws - Obligation of contracts –
No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing
the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed. No conviction
shall work a corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate: Provided,
that this provision shall not prohibit the imposition of pecuniary

Treason against the State shall consist only in levying war
against it or in adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and
comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the
testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession
in open court.

Indictment or information - Preliminary examination - Prosecutions
in courts not of record.
No person shall be prosecuted criminally in courts of record for
felony or misdemeanor otherwise than by presentment or indictment or
by information. No person shall be prosecuted for a felony by
information without having had a preliminary examination before an
examining magistrate, or having waived such preliminary examination.
Prosecutions may be instituted in courts not of record upon a duly
verified complaint.

Trial by jury.
The right of trial by jury shall be and remain inviolate, except
in civil cases wherein the amount in controversy does not exceed One
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00), or in criminal cases
wherein punishment for the offense charged is by fine only, not
exceeding One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00). Provided,
however, that the Legislature may provide for jury trial in cases
involving lesser amounts. Juries for the trial of civil cases,
involving more than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), and felony
criminal cases shall consist of twelve (12) persons. All other
juries shall consist of six (6) persons. However, in all cases the
parties may agree on a lesser number of jurors than provided herein.
In all criminal cases where imprisonment for more than six (6)
months is authorized the entire number of jurors must concur to
render a verdict. In all other cases three-fourths (3/4) of the
whole number of jurors concurring shall have power to render a
verdict. When a verdict is rendered by less than the whole number
of jurors, the verdict shall be signed by each juror concurring
Amended by State Question No. 354, Legislative Referendum No. 101,
adopted at primary election held on July 1, 1952; State Question No.
459, Legislative Referendum No. 172, adopted at election held on
Sept. 17, 1968, eff. Jan. 13, 1969; State Question No. 623,
Legislative Referendum No. 277, adopted at election held on Aug. 28,

Self-incrimination - Double jeopardy.
No person shall be compelled to give evidence which will tend to
incriminate him, except as in this Constitution specifically
provided; nor shall any person, after having been once acquitted by
a jury, be again put in jeopardy of life or liberty for that of
which he has been acquitted. Nor shall any person be twice put in
jeopardy of life or liberty for the same offense.

Liberty of speech and press - Truth as evidence in prosecution for
Every person may freely speak, write, or publish his sentiments
on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and
no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech
or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions for libel, the truth
of the matter alleged to be libelous may be given in evidence to the
jury, and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as
libelous be true, and was written or published with good motives and
for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted.

Private property - Taking or damaging for private use.
No private property shall be taken or damaged for private use,
with or without compensation, unless by consent of the owner, except
for private ways of necessity, or for drains and ditches across
lands of others for agricultural, mining, or sanitary purposes, in
such manner as may be prescribed by law.

Contempt - Definition - Jury trial - Hearing.
The legislature shall pass laws defining contempts and
regulating the proceedings and punishment in matters of contempt:
Provided, that any person accused of violating or disobeying, when
not in the presence or hearing of the court, or judge sitting as
such, any order of injunction, or restraint, made or entered by any
court or judge of the State shall, before penalty or punishment is
imposed, be entitled to a trial by jury as to the guilt or innocence
of the accused. In no case shall a penalty or punishment be imposed
for contempt, until an opportunity to be heard is given.

Witnesses not excused from testifying - Immunity from prosecution.
Any person having knowledge or possession of facts that tend to
establish the guilt of any other person or corporation under the
laws of the state shall not be excused from giving testimony or
producing evidence, when legally called upon so to do, on the ground
that it may tend to incriminate him under the laws of the state; but
no person shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or
forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing
concerning which he may so testify or produce evidence. All other
provisions of the Constitution or the laws of this state in conflict
with the provisions of this constitutional amendment are hereby
expressly repealed.
Amended by State Question No. 482, Legislative Referendum No. 188,
adopted at election held on Dec. 7, 1971.

Transportation out of State.
No person shall be transported out of the State for any offense
committed within the State, nor shall any person be transported out
of the State for any purpose, without his consent, except by due
process of law; but nothing in this provision shall prevent the
operation of extradition laws, or the transporting of persons
sentenced for crime, to other states for the purpose of

Unreasonable searches or seizures - Warrants, issuance of.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects against unreasonable searches or seizures shall 
not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause
supported by oath or affirmation, describing as particularly as may
be the place to be searched and the person or thing to be seized.

Perpetuities - Monopolies - Primogeniture - Entailments.
Perpetuities and monopolies are contrary to the genius of a free
government, and shall never be allowed, nor shall the law of
primogeniture or entailments ever be in force in this State.

Effect of enumeration of rights.
The enumeration in this Constitution of certain rights shall not
be construed to deny, impair, or disparage others retained by the

Prohibition of special treatment or discrimination based on race or
sex in public employment, education and contracts.
A. The state shall not grant preferential treatment to, or
discriminate against, any individual or group on the basis of race,
color, sex, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public
employment, public education or public contracting.
B. This section shall apply only to action taken after the
effective date of this section.
C. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting
bona fide qualifications based on sex that are reasonably necessary
to the normal operation of public employment, public education or
public contracting.
D. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as invalidating
any court order or consent decree that is in force as of the
effective date of this section.
E. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting
action that must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for
any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of
federal funds to the state.
F. For the purposes of this section, “state” shall include, but
not be limited to, the state itself or an agency, institution,
instrumentality, or political subdivision of the state.
G. The remedies available for violations of this section shall
be the same, regardless of the injured party’s race, color, sex,
ethnicity or national origin, as are otherwise available for
violations of the antidiscrimination laws of this state.
Added by State Question No. 759, Legislative Referendum No. 359,
adopted at election held on Nov. 6, 2012.
NOTE: Editorially renumbered from Article II, § 36 to avoid a
duplication in numbering.

Health Care System.
A. For purposes of this section:
1. “Compel” shall include penalties or fines;
2. “Direct payment or pay directly” means payment for lawful
health care services without a public or private third party, not
including an employer, paying for any portion of the service;
3. “Health care system” means any public or private entity
whose function or purpose is the management of, processing of,
enrollment of individuals for or payment for, in full or in part,
health care services or health care data or health care information
for its participants;
4. “Lawful health care services” means any health-related
service or treatment to the extent that the service or treatment is
permitted or not prohibited by law or regulation that may be
provided by persons or businesses otherwise permitted to offer such
services; and
5. “Penalties or fines” means any civil or criminal penalty or
fine, tax, salary or wage withholding or surcharge or any named fee
with a similar effect established by law or rule by a government
established, -created or -controlled agency that is used to punish
or discourage the exercise of rights protected under this section.
B. To preserve the freedom of Oklahomans to provide for their
health care:
1. A law or rule shall not compel, directly or indirectly, any
person, employer or health care provider to participate in any
health care system; and
2. A person or employer may pay directly for lawful health care
services and shall not be required to pay penalties or fines for
paying directly for lawful health care services. A health care
provider may accept direct payment for lawful health care services
and shall not be required to pay penalties or fines for accepting
direct payment from a person or employer for lawful health care
C. Subject to reasonable and necessary rules that do not
substantially limit a person’s options, the purchase or sale of
health insurance in private health care systems shall not be
prohibited by law or rule.
D. This section shall not:
1. Affect which health care services a health care provider or
hospital is required to perform or provide;
2. Affect which health care services are permitted by law;
3. Prohibit care related to workers’ compensation;
4. Affect laws or rules in effect as of January 1, 2010; or
5. Affect the terms or conditions of any health care system to
the extent that those terms and conditions do not have the effect of
punishing a person or employer for paying directly for lawful health
care services or a health care provider or hospital for accepting
direct payment from a person or employer for lawful health care
Added by State Question No. 756, Legislative Referendum No. 356,
adopted at election held on Nov. 2, 2010.

Violation of any of the prior CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS enumerated by the People of the State of Oklahoma conditional their incorporation of the State and its operation, are felony criminal acts under 18 U.S. Code section 241.

Use of claims to entice or suggest injury due to gender or to misgender with threat of serious bodily harm including psychological injury to produce impaired conditions that might define conditions of temporary illness or emotional or cognitive incapacity or degraded function, are 18 U.S. Code section 249 "HATE CRIME" felony violations; and evident in the false claims of "mental illness" themed a hereditary condition from "torture, abuse, stalking, harassment, or other material interference in the persons ordinary conduct and access to the public and markets of the commercial industry and right of way to travel and conduct business freely there without impedement."

Copyright © 2022 - SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C.